Really funny stuff from Minimumble.com! Go check it out!

Really funny stuff from Minimumble.com! Go check it out!

Why Doesn’t God Heal Amputees?

christusexemplar:

This argument is an internet sensation, but I find it utterly unconvincing for a few reasons: 

1. This objection assumes that God has never healed an amputee.  However, how can one know that God has never healed any amputee ever in human history?

2. It is possible that God has morally sufficient reasons for not healing amputees. Since this is at the very least possible, this objection fails.

As philosopher J.P. Moreland has pointed out, it is possible that:

“God maintains a delicate balance between keeping his existence sufficiently evident so people will know He’s there and yet hiding His presence enough so that people who want to choose to ignore Him can do it. This way, their choice of destiny is really free.”

3. Even if God has never healed an amputee at any moment in human history it still does not follow that He doesn’t exist.  One still must deal with the positive evidence that suggests God does exist.

4. I believe the person making this objection is operating under a false assumption.  Let us imagine that an amputee prays to be healed and wakes up the next morning with their once missing limb fully in tact.  I could easily imagine those who would still search for a naturalistic explanation for how the limb returned in spite of the evidence that a miracle had occurred.  This objection assumes that the problem is intellectual.  However, it could be that the objector is suppressing the truth simply because they do not want to be accountable to God.  In other words, it could be that their problem with God is not an intellectual one, but a moral one.

(*) rights not owned, original source here

-Richard Wurmbrand, The Answer to the Atheist Handbook

-Richard Wurmbrand, The Answer to the Atheist Handbook

The true mercy of God chose this most powerful way to destroy the devil’s work; He would not use the power of force, but the reason of justice.
Henry De Bracton
Newfound identity in Christ compelled me to live in obedience to God whether my temptations changed or not. The gospel is about more than just correct beliefs; it leads to correct living as a result of correct beliefs. Biblical change is not the absence of struggles but the freedom to choose holiness in the midst of our struggles.
Christopher Yuan
When I say Christianity is true, I mean it is true to total reality - the total of what is, beginning with the central reality: the objective existence of a personal-infinite God. Christianity is not just a series of truths, but Truth - Truth about all reality.
Francis Schaeffer (from A Christian Manifesto)
Gay is NOT the new Black

[Awesome article by Voddie Baucham.]

It’s hard to deny that homosexual marriage appears to be a foregone conclusion in America. This is a frightening prospect not only for those of us who understand marriage to be a testimony of the relationship between Christ and his bride, the church, but also for all who value the family and its contribution to the well-being of society and human thriving. And while it’s difficult to watch a coordinated, well-funded, well-connected propaganda strategy undermine thousands of years of human history, it’s especially disconcerting to witness the use of the civil rights struggle as the vehicle for the strategy.

The idea that same-sex “marriage” is the next leg in the civil rights race is ubiquitous. One of the clearest examples of the conflation of homosexual “marriage” and civil rights is Michael Gross’s article in The Advocate, in which he coins the now-popular phrase “Gay is the new black.”1 Gross is not alone in his conflation of the two issues, however. At a 2005 banquet, Julian Bond, former head of the NAACP, said, “Sexual disposition parallels race. I was born this way. I have no choice. I wouldn’t change it if I could. Sexuality is unchangeable.”2

Read More

  • Tumblr User:

    It's important to stand up for your beliefs

  • Tumblr User:

    Unless you're a republican

  • Tumblr User:

    or a Christian

  • Tumblr User:

    or straight

  • Tumblr User:

    or if your beliefs are different than mine.

Anonymous
asks:
wait! I'm confused O_O.... I thought creationist believe the world is 6,000 years old? :O

Hey, there!

Thank you for writing!

____

Well, Anon, that statement is inaccurate.

Not all creationists believe that the Earth/Universe is 6,000 years old.

I need to stress that this is a non-issue in terms of salvation, veracity of the Bible, and other, more central things, in Christianity. It’s a differing issue amongst Christians, but it’s not one so huge that it causes rifts between us. At least, it shouldn’t be.

Now, as a Physicist, I know there are different ways to measure the age of the universe. There are four main ones, each independent of each other, that reach the same conclusion: Everything’s been around for about 13.7 Billion years.

How do I know?

Method #1: Expansion Rate.

The universe is constantly expanding (like a balloon when someone blows into it). That means that if we know how fast it is expanding, we can mathematically reverse the expansion until the universe reverts back to it’s beginning.

How do we calculate this expansion? Measuring the distance from other galaxies to our own and observing how fast these other galaxies are moving away from us. If we know the distances and velocities of enough galaxies, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, and thus the age of the universe.

And we do.

____

Method #2: Cosmic Background Radiation Temperature.

I believe that, for the universe to have been created ex nihilo, God used a lot of energy. A lot. Energy makes heat. So, a LOT of energy makes a LOT of heat. Ever since Creation, though, the Universe has been cooling down.

When we measure the cosmic background radiation (or, you know, “take the temperature” of the universe), the readings indicate that the temperatures all around us are about -455ºF (that’s jut 2.725ºC above absolute zero!!). Interestingly enough, these temperatures vary little; in fact, less than 1 part in 10,000. Given the geometry of the universe and these temperature readings, we can calculate for how long the universe has been cooling, and thus, know the age of the universe.

_____

Method #3: Age of the stars

Stars are simple objects. They are 100% gas, burning through the process of nuclear fusion. This process is very well understood and experimentally verified.

It’s because the process of stellar burning is so well understood, that we can determine the age of a star if we knows the mass, color, and brightness of the star (all of these characteristics can be measured from your local observatory).  From this data, we can know how long the star has been burning. This places a boundary on how old the universe must be, since it can’t be any younger than the oldest star.

____

Method #4: Measuring Relative Quantities of Radioactive Isotopes

As you might imagine, this one’s a little technical. Radioactive isotopes are, basically, the crazy cousins of any given element of the periodic table. They have a different mass than their normal counterparts and their nuclei are unstable. Radioactive isotopes get rid of excess energy by shooting off alpha, beta and gamma rays - which are the building blocks of comic book heroes.

Now, radioactive isotopes are produced by supernovae, which are supergiant stars in their last stage of burning off their gases.

It turns out that radioactive isotopes decay at rates (half-lives) that are well understood. Uranium and thorium, for example, have half-lives of billions of years. So, since we still find uranium and thorium in the universe, we know that the universe cannot be so old that these isotopes had completely decayed out of existence. That sets an upper limit to the age of the universe of a few hundred billion years.

HOWEVER, there are isotopes that have much lower half-lives. So, isotopes with half-lives of millions of years or less (like plutonium, neptunium or technetium) cannot be found here on Earth. Why is this important? This is how we know that at least one billion years have gone by for them to have disappeared. These extinct (on Earth) isotopes were produced by ancient supernovae. By measuring the amounts of these isotopes in existence today, we can calculate how much time has passed since the first supernovae produced the first isotopes. So, the Earth is at least a couple of millions years old. Obviously, the universe must be older than this.

____

I hope you were able to follow, at least at a basic level, these four methods. Like I said, there are many other independent methods that have been used to calculate the age of the universe, but these four are the simplest. What’s interesting about these methods is that they rely on different and independent measurement techniques, but they all arrive at the same answer for the age of the universe – around 13.7 billion years.

Obviously, it’s easy to attack one measurement technique as being inaccurate. Four, though? That’s when you need to pay attention - especially since they all arrive at the same answer. The laws of physics used to date the universe are very well understood and experimentally verified to a great degree of precision. So, in my opinion, to dismiss all of these independent measurements as “erroneous” simply displays a lack of understanding of physics and mathematics.

But that’s just me.

Now, let me say this again: the age of the universe (or Earth) does not undermine Scripture - at all.  Whether the universe is 13.7 billion years old or 6,000 years old has no bearing on the truths taught in the Bible.  As Christians, we are to seek out the truth, no matter what it may be. The findings of science will never the contradict the Word of God, so engage with science and enjoy the discoveries that lie ahead of us.

It’s fun to see the creativeness and limitless power of God at work in things like the universe… or your heart ;-)

God Bless and have an awesome day!!

It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.
G.K. Chesterton
verdadyfe:

So, my sister painted a tree with chalkboard paint and I wrote a poem on it.

I designed the poem so that you can start from any of the bottom branches and read through to the other side, which is why there’s no punctuation.

From right-to-left, it reads:

“As our smile storms the tree
Our embrace will take us far
Caressed by the breeze let us be
Kiss me under the stars

As your eyes softly sing to me
The night the light thieves
The branches dance in melody 
As the wind plays the leaves”

From left-to-right:

“As the wind plays the leaves
The branches dance in melody
The night the light thieves
As your eyes slowly sing to me

Kiss me under the stars
Caressed by the breeze let us be
Our embrace will take us far
As our smiles storm the tree”

Enjoy!

verdadyfe:

So, my sister painted a tree with chalkboard paint and I wrote a poem on it.

I designed the poem so that you can start from any of the bottom branches and read through to the other side, which is why there’s no punctuation.

From right-to-left, it reads:

“As our smile storms the tree
Our embrace will take us far
Caressed by the breeze let us be
Kiss me under the stars

As your eyes softly sing to me
The night the light thieves
The branches dance in melody
As the wind plays the leaves”

From left-to-right:

“As the wind plays the leaves
The branches dance in melody
The night the light thieves
As your eyes slowly sing to me

Kiss me under the stars
Caressed by the breeze let us be
Our embrace will take us far
As our smiles storm the tree”

Enjoy!

Those that know, do. Those that understand, teach.
Aristotle (via desertmanian)
What it should mean to be single.

What it should mean to be single.